Benchmarks / Agentic

Terminal-Bench 2.0

Terminal-Bench 2.0: task resolution rate for agent+model pairs on 89 terminal tasks. Kept for time travel.

40models
–Open Index weight
–last updated

Terminal-Bench 2.0

Higher is better · best effort per model

Chart settings
40 of 40 selected

full table below

#ModelEffortScoreCost / taskHarness
1GPT-5.5xhigh84.7%–NexAU-AHE
2Gemini 3.1 Prohigh80.2%–TongAgents
3Opus 4.7max80.2%–WOZCODE
4GPT-5.3 Codexxhigh78.4%–SageAgent
5Opus 4.6max76.4%–Meta-Harness
6Gemini 3 Prohigh69.4%–Ante
7GPT-5.2 Codexxhigh66.5%–Deep Agents
8GPT-5.2xhigh64.9%–Droid
9Gemini 3 Flashhigh64.3%–Junie CLI
10Opus 4.5high63.1%–Droid
11GPT-5.1 Codex Minihigh61.6%–hookele
12GPT-5.1 Codexmax60.4%–Codex CLI
13Grok 4.20xhigh57.3%–Grok CLI
14Sonnet 4.6max53.4%–Simplai Agent
15GLM 5high52.4%–Terminus 2
16GPT-5high49.6%–Codex CLI
17GPT-5.1high47.6%–Terminus 2
18Sonnet 4.5high46.5%–CAMEL-AI
19MiniMax M2.7high45.1%–IndusAGI Coding Agent
20GPT-5 Codexhigh44.3%–Codex CLI
21Kimi K2.5max43.2%–Terminus 2
22MiniMax M2.5high42.7%–cchuter
23DeepSeek V3.2high39.6%–Terminus 2
24Opus 4.1high38.0%–Terminus 2
25MiniMax M2.1–36.6%–Crux
26Kimi K2medium35.7%–Terminus 2
27Haiku 4.5xhigh35.5%–Goose
28GPT-5 Minihigh34.8%–spoox-o-m
29GLM 4.7none33.4%–Terminus 2
30Gemini 2.5 Prohigh32.6%–Terminus 2
31MiniMax M2–30.0%–Terminus 2
32Grok 4high27.2%–OpenHands
33Qwen 3 Codermedium27.2%–Dakou Agent
34Qwen 3.6 35B-A3Bmax24.6%–little-coder
35GLM 4.6none24.5%–Terminus 2
36GPT-5 Nanohigh21.8%–spoox-o-m
37gpt-oss-120bhigh18.7%–Terminus 2
38Gemini 2.5 Flashmedium17.1%–Mini-SWE-Agent
39gpt-oss-20bhigh17.0%–Terminus 2
40Qwen 3.5 9Blow9.2%–little-coder