Benchmarks / 3D

SlopBench

Runs 53 chat-style prompts and reports the percentage of model responses containing classic AI slop patterns, detected deterministically without an LLM judge. Maintained by Dan Cleary. Score: Slop Rate: percentage of responses with at least one slop-pattern hit (lower is better).

25models
–Open Index weight
–last updated

SlopBench

Lower is better · best effort per model

Chart settings
25 of 25 selected

full table below

#ModelEffortScoreCost / taskHarness
1GPT-5.3 Codexxhigh1.9%––
2Opus 4.8max3.8%––
3GPT-5.4xhigh4.3%––
4GPT-5.3xhigh5.7%––
5GPT-5.4 Minixhigh5.7%––
6GPT-5.5xhigh5.7%––
7GPT-5.4 Nanoxhigh7.5%––
8Sonnet 4.6max9.8%––
9Opus 4.7max11.3%––
10Grok 4.20xhigh13.2%––
11Gemini 3 Flashhigh15.1%––
12Haiku 4.5xhigh15.1%––
13Fable 5max15.1%––
14GPT-5.4 Proxhigh17.0%––
15Grok Build 0.1–18.9%––
16GLM 5high19.2%––
17Qwen 3.5 397B-A17Bmax23.5%––
18Kimi K2medium24.5%––
19Opus 4.6max24.5%––
20Grok 4.1 Fasthigh26.4%––
21MiniMax M2.5high26.4%––
22Kimi K2.5max26.4%––
23Gemini 3.1 Prohigh28.3%––
24Qwen 3 Maxmax32.7%––
25DeepSeek V3.2high44.2%––