Benchmarks / Agentic

MCP Atlas (Scale AI)

How reliably a model completes realistic multi-step workflows over real Model Context Protocol servers: discovering the right tool in a noisy tool menu, calling it with correct parameters, recovering from errors and synthesising the results into an accurate final answer. Maintained by Scale AI. Score: Pass rate in percent over all 1,000 tasks; the published ± is the confidence half-width.

30models
–Open Index weight
–last updated

MCP Atlas (Scale AI)

Higher is better · best effort per model

Chart settings
30 of 30 selected

full table below

#ModelEffortScoreCost / taskHarness
1Muse Spark 1.1max88.1%––
2Fable 5.1max87.2%––
3Opus 5xhigh85.8%––
4Qwen 3.8xhigh84.5%––
5GLM 5.3max84.2%––
6Gemini 3.5 Flashhigh83.6%––
7Fable 5max83.3%––
8Kimi K3max82.3%––
9Muse Spark–82.2%––
10Opus 4.8max82.2%––
11GPT-5.6 Solmax81.8%––
12Inkling Smallxhigh79.2%––
13Opus 4.7max79.1%––
14Gemini 3.1 Prohigh78.2%––
15Opus 4.6max76.8%––
16Inklingxhigh76.0%––
17GPT-5.5xhigh75.3%––
18GPT-5.4xhigh70.6%––
19Gemini 3 Prohigh70.3%––
20Opus 4.5high69.8%––
21Sonnet 4.6max69.5%––
22GPT-5.2xhigh67.6%––
23Nemotron 3 Ultramax63.1%––
24Gemini 3 Flashhigh62.0%––
25Sonnet 4.5high59.5%––
26Gemini 3.1 Flash-Litehigh57.1%––
27GPT-5.4 Minixhigh56.7%––
28GPT-5.1high50.1%––
29o3 prohigh44.5%––
30Haiku 4.5xhigh40.2%––