Benchmarks / Coding

Aider Polyglot

Evaluates LLMs on 225 Exercism coding exercises across six languages, testing code editing without human intervention. Maintained by Paul Gauthier. Score: Percent of the 225 Exercism exercises completed with a correct edit.

37models
–Open Index weight
–last updated

Aider Polyglot

Higher is better · best effort per model

Chart settings
37 of 37 selected

full table below

#ModelEffortScoreCost / taskHarness
1GPT-5high88.0%––
2o3 prohigh84.9%––
3Gemini 2.5 Prohigh83.1%––
4o3high81.3%––
5Grok 4high79.6%––
6GPT-4.1high78.2%––
7DeepSeek V3.2high74.2%––
8Opus 4medium72.0%––
9o4 minihigh72.0%––
10DeepSeek R1xhigh71.4%––
11o1high61.7%––
12Sonnet 4high61.3%––
13o3 minihigh60.4%––
14Qwen 3 235B-A22Bxhigh59.6%––
15Kimi K2medium59.1%––
16Gemini 2.5 Flashmedium55.1%––
17DeepSeek V3none55.1%––
18Grok 3none53.3%––
19Sonnet 3.5medium51.6%––
20Grok 3 Minihigh49.3%––
21GPT-4.5none44.9%––
22gpt-oss-120bhigh41.8%––
23Qwen 3 32Bnone40.0%––
24Gemini 1206–38.2%––
25Gemini 2.0 Pronone35.6%––
26o1 minihigh32.9%––
27GPT-4.1 Minihigh32.4%––
28Haiku 3.5medium28.0%––
29Qwen 2.5 Codernone26.2%––
30GPT-4ohigh23.1%––
31Gemini 2.0 Flashmedium22.2%––
32DeepSeek V2.5none17.8%––
33Llama 4 Maverickmedium15.6%––
34Codestral 25.01–11.1%––
35GPT-4.1 Nanohigh8.9%––
36Gemma 3 27B ITmedium4.9%––
37GPT-4o minihigh3.6%––