Benchmarks / Agentic

MazeBench

Uses gems collected on the populated first-party ASCII-with-tools leaderboard. Score: share of MazeBench's 100 gems collected. Collected by Jake Boggs' benchmark dashboard.

25models
–Open Index weight
–last updated
boggspublisher

MazeBench

Higher is better · best effort per model

Chart settings
25 of 25 selected

full table below

#ModelEffortScoreCost / taskHarness
1GPT-6 Astramax23.0%––
2GPT-6.1 Solmax17.0%––
3Opus 5.5max13.0%––
4GPT-5.6 Solmax13.0%––
5Opus 5max12.0%––
6Fable 5max11.0%––
7Fable 5.1max10.0%––
8Sonnet 5.5max8.0%––
9GPT-6 Solmax7.0%––
10GPT-5.6 Terramax6.0%––
11Gemini 3.8 Flashmax4.0%––
12Haiku 5.5max1.0%––
13Gemini 3.1 Prohigh1.0%––
14Gemini 3.7 Flashmax1.0%––
15Grok 4.6max1.0%––
16Kimi K3max1.0%––
17Sonnet 5max0.0%––
18DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731max0.0%––
19DeepSeek V4 Promax0.0%––
20Gemini 3.6 Flashxhigh0.0%––
21GLM 5.3max0.0%––
22GLM 5.3 Flashmax0.0%––
23GPT-5.6 Lunamax0.0%––
24Muse Spark 1.3max0.0%––
25Qwen 3.8 Maxmax0.0%––