Benchmarks / Coding

FrontierCode 1.1-AA

AA's run of Cognition's FrontierCode 1.1 Main (100 private tasks, three attempts each, 250-turn cap): would a repository's maintainers merge the change? Mean score; an attempt failing a blocking check scores 0. Separate from Cognition's own leaderboard, which uses different harnesses.

25models
–Open Index weight
–last updated

FrontierCode 1.1-AA

Higher is better · best effort per model

Chart settings
25 of 25 selected

full table below

#ModelEffortScoreCost / taskHarness
1Opus 5.5medium57.1%–Stirrup
2GPT-6.1 Solmax49.1%–Stirrup
3Fable 5.1max49.0%–Stirrup
4GPT-6 Astramax47.0%–Stirrup
5Sonnet 5.5xhigh46.1%–Stirrup
6Haiku 5.5xhigh45.5%–Stirrup
7MiMo V2.6 Pro–45.4%–Stirrup
8DeepSeek V4.1 Flashmax44.0%–Stirrup
9Kimi K3max43.6%–Stirrup
10Gemini 4high43.5%–Stirrup
11Qwen 3.8 Maxmax43.2%–Stirrup
12MiMo V2.6 Flash–42.1%–Stirrup
13GPT-6 Lunamax41.9%–Stirrup
14GLM 5.3 Flashmax41.0%–Stirrup
15Muse Spark 1.3max40.6%–Stirrup
16GLM 5.3max40.1%–Stirrup
17Grok 4.7low39.6%–Stirrup
18Step 5 Preview–38.4%–Stirrup
19Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh36.4%–Stirrup
20Qwen 3.8 27Bxhigh34.2%–Stirrup
21K2 Horizon 375B A23B–32.1%–Stirrup
22MiniMax M3–23.0%–Stirrup
23Inklingxhigh15.8%–Stirrup
24Muse Glimmer (High)high13.9%–Stirrup
25Nemotron 3 Ultramax10.5%–Stirrup